Environmental Hogwash
Investor’s Business Daily recently ran an editorial on the great harm our ethanol loving Congress has imposed on us.
The use of ethanol is having devastating effect on our ability to feed the world, pay for affordable food and how it is increasing global warming.
Think about this. It takes one barrel of crude oil to make ¾ of a barrel of ethanol.
What futures are at all time high? Food prices are through the roof.
Our Congress and big Corporate Agriculture have duped us again. Now if Al Gore really has the earth’s good fortune in mind, I look forward to the “Inconvenient Truth About Ethanol.” I will not hold my breath on this one.
Genetically modified corn and sugar are everywhere. Not one acre of these millions of acres of this genetically modified feed one animal or human, but contribute to global warming.
This multibillion dollar force was slipped in under our noses while the NY Times and the Washington Post kept us all amused with erroneous journalism about Iraq, Iran and terrorism and Senator McCain.
Meanwhile, $100.00 barrel of oil is crushing an already strained economy and guess who else. The Average American.
Read on.
Investor’s Business Daily Editorial, February 2008.
Bio Foolish Behavior
Environment: In 2005, America used 15% of its corn crop to replace just 2% of its gasoline. Two new studies say use of biofuels will leave the world a warmer and hungrier place.
The law of unintended consequences has reared its ugly head once again, with a study published in the February 7th issue of the journal Science.
According to University of Minnesota ecologist and study co-author David Tilman, converting the grasslands of the U.S. to corn for ethanol releases excess CO2 emissions of 134 metric tons per hectare (equal to 2.47 acres).
The reason is that plants, from grasses to trees, store carbon dioxide in their roots, shoots and leaves.
“I know that when I look at a tree that half the dry weight is carbon,” says Tilman. “That’s going to end up as a carbon dioxide in the atmosphere when you cut it down.” “Any biofuel that causes land clearing is likely to increase global warming,” says Nature Conservancy ecologist Joseph Fargione, the lead author of a second study also published in Science.
Fargione notes that ethanol demand in the U.S. has caused farmers to plant more corn and less soy. This has driven up soy prices and caused farmers in Brazil to clear more acres of rainforest to plant the increasingly valuable soy.
Tim Searchinger, an agricultural expert at Princeton University and lead author of the first study, says, “There is a huge imbalance between the carbon (released) by plowing up a hectare of forest or grassland from the benefit you get from biofuels.”
According to Searchinger, “Corn-based ethanol, instead of producing 20% savings, nearly doubles the greenhouse gas emissions over 30 years and increases greenhouse gases for 167 years.”
So it’s not surprising that 10 prominent scientists have written a letter to President Bush and other government leaders urging them to “shape policies to assure that government incentives for biofuels do not increase global warming.”
Marcel Silvius, a climate expert at Wetlands International in the Netherlands, recently led a team that weighed the benefits of palm oil against the ecological harm from clearing virgin Asian rainforests for new plantations. He concluded that as a fuel, palm oil is more like snake oil, noting: “As a biofuel, it’s a failure.”
A team from Wetlands, Delft Hydraulics and the Alterra Research Center of Wageningen University produced a four-year study that detailed the environmental harm caused by the use of palm oil as an alternative energy source. The team zeroed in on Indonesia and Malaysia, where 85% of commercial palm oil is grown.
The study found that 1.4 billion tons of carbon dioxide goes up in smoke every year from rain forest fires set to clear new land for biofuel plantations. An additional 600 million tons seep into the air from drained peat swamps. Those 2 billion tons of CO2 constitute 8% of the earth’s fossil fuel emissions.
AS we have noted, our increased use of corn for ethanol has driven up U.S. food prices across the board.
This process, Tilman notes, is “equivalent to saying we will try to reduce greenhouse gases by reducing food consumption. Unfortunately, a lot of that comes from the world’s poorest people. We are converting their food into our fuel.”
“We are witnessing the beginnings of one of the great tragedies of history,” Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, said in a written statement. “The United States, in a misguided effort to reduce its oil insecurity by converting grain into fuel for cars, is generating global food insecurity on a scale never seen before.”
To avoid drilling in ANWR, we are increasing emissions of the greenhouse gases previously absorbed by plants and encouraging that process around the world. Meanwhile, a world or hungry people watches us stick ears of corn into our gas tanks.
END
Learn more at www.infinitehealthresources.com. Click Environmental and Green News.
|
